


Neutral Salt Spray · Acetic Acid Salt Spray · Copper Accelerated Test · Cyclic Corrosion Testing
ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited Testing Where Applicable | Corrosion Testing Capability | Automotive Standard Testing
A vehicle’s underbody, fasteners, brackets, exterior fittings and coated metal parts are exposed to moisture, road salt, temperature changes and surface damage throughout service life. Manufacturers need a controlled way to evaluate whether a coating, plating or corrosion protection system meets the requirement stated in an OEM drawing or material specification.
Salt spray testing provides controlled corrosion exposure inside a test chamber. It should not be treated as a direct conversion from test hours to years of road use. The result is used for comparison, qualification and quality control against a defined standard, exposure duration and acceptance criterion.
For automotive parts, the most commonly referenced standards are ISO 9227 and ASTM B117. ASTM B117 is broadly comparable to the neutral salt spray atmosphere in ISO 9227, while ISO 9227 also includes AASS and CASS atmospheres for specific materials and coating systems.

Salt spray testing, also called salt fog testing, exposes a specimen to an atomised salt solution in a controlled chamber. The test is used to assess how a material, coating, plating or corrosion protection system responds under a defined corrosive atmosphere.
For automotive components, the result is usually assessed through visual inspection after a defined exposure period. Depending on the specification, the report may evaluate white corrosion, red rust, blistering, corrosion creep from scribed areas, coating breakdown or another acceptance criterion.
| What the test checks | Why it matters |
| Corrosion formation | Shows whether corrosion appears within the specified exposure period |
| Coating or plating performance | Helps assess whether surface protection meets the requirement |
| Corrosion creep from scribe | Used when the specification requires evaluation from a damaged coating line |
| White corrosion or red rust | Common acceptance criteria for plated or coated metallic parts |
| Visual rating or pass fail result | Supports supplier approval, production validation or OEM submission |
Salt spray testing is useful because it is standardised and repeatable. Its main limitation is that it does not reproduce every real driving condition such as drying cycles, UV exposure, road debris, coating damage or climate variation.

ISO 9227 defines three main salt spray atmospheres. The correct atmosphere should come from the customer specification, not from general preference.
| ISO 9227 atmosphere | Common name | Typical use |
| NSS | Neutral Salt Spray | General corrosion testing for metallic materials with or without corrosion protection |
| AASS | Acetic Acid Salt Spray | More aggressive testing for selected coatings, aluminium related applications and decorative plating systems where specified |
| CASS | Copper Accelerated Acetic Acid Salt Spray | Highly aggressive testing often used for decorative copper nickel chromium or nickel chromium coating systems where specified |
NSS is the most common route for automotive coated or plated parts. AASS and CASS should only be selected when the product standard, OEM requirement or customer specification calls for those atmospheres.
ASTM B117 is the American standard practice for operating salt spray or salt fog apparatus. In automotive supply chains, it is often referenced by North American drawings, material standards and customer requirements.
The key point is that ASTM B117 should be compared mainly with ISO 9227 NSS. It should not be treated as identical to ISO 9227 as a whole because ISO 9227 also includes AASS and CASS.
| Dimension | ISO 9227 | ASTM B117 |
| Main scope | Salt spray testing with NSS, AASS and CASS | Salt spray or salt fog apparatus practice |
| Closest overlap | ISO 9227 NSS | ASTM B117 neutral salt fog |
| Additional atmospheres | AASS and CASS included | Not the main focus |
| Typical use | Global, European and Asian OEM specifications | North American and ASTM based specifications |
| Test duration | Set by product, OEM or customer specification | Set by product, OEM or customer specification |
| Acceptance criteria | Defined by the citing specification | Defined by the citing specification |
A chamber capable of running one method may often support the other when properly validated, but the report must follow the exact standard named in the requirement.
Continuous salt spray testing creates a constant salt fog environment. It is repeatable, but it does not represent every condition that a vehicle experiences in service. Real exposure often includes wet periods, dry periods, humidity changes, temperature variation and surface damage.
Cyclic corrosion testing is used when the specification requires alternating phases instead of constant salt fog.
| Test type | Exposure pattern | When it is used |
| Continuous salt spray | Constant salt fog exposure | When ISO 9227 NSS, AASS, CASS or ASTM B117 is specified |
| Cyclic corrosion testing | Alternating salt, humidity, drying and sometimes other stages | When an OEM protocol requires changing wet and dry exposure |
| OEM corrosion protocol | Defined by manufacturer standard | When the drawing references a specific automotive corrosion method |
If the requirement names a cyclic corrosion method, it should not be replaced with continuous salt spray unless the customer approves the change.
Test duration is set by the product specification, customer requirement or OEM drawing. The laboratory should not assume one generic duration for every component.
| Example duration | Common use case | Important note |
| 24 to 96 hours | Basic screening or lower severity requirements | Use only when the specification allows it |
| 240 hours | Moderate coating or plating requirements | Acceptance depends on the defined corrosion limit |
| 500 hours | Higher durability or exterior related requirements | Does not equal a fixed number of service years |
| 1,000 hours or more | Demanding corrosion resistance requirements | Requires advance scheduling and chamber planning |
A component can pass a shorter exposure and still fail a longer one. This is why the required duration and acceptance criterion must be confirmed before testing starts.
The correct test method should always come from the drawing, material specification or customer requirement. A request that only says “salt spray test” is usually not enough.
| Component or finish | Likely test route | What to confirm |
| Painted or coated steel parts | ISO 9227 NSS or ASTM B117 | Exposure duration, scribe requirement and corrosion limit |
| Plated fasteners | ISO 9227 NSS or ASTM B117 | White corrosion, red rust and coating specific criteria |
| Aluminium components | ISO 9227 NSS or AASS where specified | Material grade, coating type and atmosphere |
| Decorative plating systems | AASS or CASS where specified | Plating system and required severity |
| Exterior parts with wet dry exposure | Cyclic corrosion testing where specified | Exact OEM cycle and inspection points |
Before testing, confirm the standard, atmosphere, duration, sample condition, inspection interval and pass fail criteria.
A salt spray test result shows the condition of the specimen after exposure under a defined method. It may report corrosion products, coating blistering, corrosion creep, red rust, white corrosion or another visible change depending on the material and coating.
The result should be interpreted only against the acceptance criteria in the specification. It does not automatically prove long term field performance unless the customer has defined how the result should be used.
A complete report should state the standard used, test atmosphere, exposure duration, chamber conditions, sample description, inspection points and observed result.
Prepare these details before requesting a salt spray test.
If these details are missing, the laboratory may need to clarify the requirement before testing can begin.
Is ISO 9227 the same as ASTM B117
Not exactly. ASTM B117 is broadly comparable to ISO 9227 NSS. ISO 9227 also includes AASS and CASS, so the two standards should not be treated as identical in every case.
Can salt spray test hours be converted into years of service life
No. Salt spray hours should not be converted directly into years of service life. Real vehicle exposure depends on climate, road salt use, humidity, temperature, coating damage, design and maintenance.
How do I know whether to use NSS, AASS or CASS
The required atmosphere should come from the customer or OEM specification. NSS is the most common neutral salt spray atmosphere. AASS and CASS are more aggressive and should be used only where specified.
What does a salt spray test result show
It shows how the tested specimen performed under a defined corrosive atmosphere for a defined exposure period. The result is compared against the acceptance criteria in the specification.
Can a component pass 96 hours but fail 500 hours
Yes. A coating or plating system can look acceptable after a shorter exposure and still show unacceptable corrosion after a longer exposure.
ALS Testing can support salt spray and corrosion testing for coated, plated and metallic automotive components where testing is required for qualification, supplier approval, process validation or customer submission.
Testing under ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation is available where covered by the applicable accredited scope. If accredited results are required for submission, confirm the exact method and scope before testing begins.
Providing these details at the enquiry stage helps the laboratory confirm the correct method, chamber configuration, schedule and report format before the test begins.
ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited Testing Where Applicable | ISO 9227 and ASTM B117 Capability | Cyclic Corrosion Testing Available